TOEFL Listening Exercise 220 de June de 2021 2021-06-20 21:00
Professor – New research results are consistent with the controversial theory that an extraterrestrial body such as a comet impacted the Earth approximately 12,900 years ago, possibly contributing to the significant climatic and ecological changes that date to that time period. The paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS) includes significant findings about the nature of so-called “microspherules” that were found at a number of prehistoric sites, based on the research done at North Carolina State. While the findings are interesting in themselves, the paper is only the latest in a heated scholarly debate focused on whether such an impact event took place. The debate dates back to a 2007 paper, in which researchers reported finding evidence at multiple sites of a significant impact event. The evidence cited in that paper included a large increase in the abundance of magnetic microspherules at the study sites. The microspherules were metallic spheres in the range of 20 to 50 micrometers. For comparison, human hair is 50 to 100 micrometers in diameter. Specifically, the 2007 team found hundreds to thousands of these microspherules in each kilogram of dirt they sampled at the Younger Dryas Boundary layer of several sites. The Younger Dryas Boundary marks the period when the Earth’s climate reverted to conditions similar to the Ice Age and populations of prehistoric animals, such as mammoths, appear to have dropped off precipitously. It also marks the period when the Clovis culture in North America seems to have experienced a significant population decline or some significant cultural modification. Samples were also taken from layers above and below the YDB. Microspherules were found in much greater numbers in the dirt samples taken from the YDB as compared to the samples from other layers. These microspherules have a variety of natural and artificial sources, including impact events, volcanoes, and industrial pollution. Most types of microspherules are easily distinguished from one another. However, in 2009, another team of researchers published a paper calling the 2007 findings into question. The researchers had examined two of the sites cited in the 2007 paper: the Blackwater Draw site in New Mexico and the Topper site in South Carolina as well as 5 others, and reported that its researchers were unable to find increased numbers of the relevant microspherules in the YDB at all but on one site and even that site was questionable. Now, the new PNAS paper finds that the 2009 study relied on flawed protocols. Perhaps more importantly, the researchers behind the new study have re-examined the Blackwater Draw and Topper sites as well as a third site in Maryland common to the 2009 study; and were able to find microspherules in amounts consistent with the 2007 hypothesis at each site. “Our study replicates only a small subset of the research reported in 2007 and within those narrow limits, our results are consistent with theirs. Much research remains to be done to prove or disprove the hypothesis,” says Dr. Malcolm LeCompte of Elizabeth City State University, who is lead author of the new PNAS paper. LeCompte brought some of these microspherules to the Analytical Instrumentation Facility (AIF), at NC State, which provides both analytical instrumentation and expert staff to help researchers analyze and characterize materials and material structures at the micro and nanoscale. “They wanted to know what’s in these spherules and where they came from,” says Charles Mooney, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) lab manager at AIF. “We analyzed the microspherules with an SEM, which allowed us to obtain high-resolution images of the microspherules. We also collected X-rays generated by electron beam-sample interactions to tell us what elements were in each sample,” Mooney explains. “This told us that the microspherules were largely made up of iron, aluminum, silicon, and traditionally titanium.” Dr. Dale Batchelor, director of operations at AIF, also sliced open some of the microspherules using an analytical instrument composed of both a focused ion-beam (FIB) and an SEM to examine their interior structure and composition. Interestingly, some of the microspherules were partially hollow but exhibited internal crystal structures when cross-sectioned with the FIB. “To our knowledge this is the first instance of the FIB technique being used to cross-section YBD microspherules. In effect, exploratory surgery on the microscale,” Batchelor says. “The FIB is the scalpel and the SEM is the eye.” Most of the microspherules were made up of elements in proportion similar to the composition of the Earth’s crust and not, as some had proposed, meteorite material. In addition, the surface characteristics of the microspherules indicate that they were heated to a molten temperature and then cooled rapidly. “This is consistent with the theory of an impact event but falls short of proof positive,” says LeCompte.
0 of 6 Questions completed
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
0 of 6 Questions answered correctly
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
1. What is this lecture mainly about?CorrectIncorrect
2. When did the “scholarly debate” first begin?CorrectIncorrect
3. Why does the professor mention the diameter of a human hair?CorrectIncorrect
4. When were these findings put into question?CorrectIncorrect
5. What conclusions were made about this paper that put the other theory into question?CorrectIncorrect
6. What was finally discovered about the composition of the microspherules?CorrectIncorrect